The American Athletic Conference is Not a Joke
By Michael Schneid
If an American Athletic team goes .500, you have a chance at
making the NCAA tournament. If a football team goes 6-6, you will go to a
weird-named bowl game, like the Idaho Potato Bowl.
I
think its also fair to say, teams like Memphis, Temple, UCF, SMU, and
Houston are bigger winners. You can't call the conference as a whole, a
loser. Memphis has swept through C-USA basketball the last two years.
This year, UConn, Cincy, Temple, and defending champion Louisville will
provide much stiffer competition. Which may even better prepare them for
the NCAA tournament, where they have failed to advance to the Sweet 16
under Josh Pastner.
The American
Athletic Conference is a realignment winner. And the teams will prove it
on the field and on the court in the coming years.
The Big East as we all once knew it is officially gone. It became officially official on July 1.
The Big East is still in business and is operating as usual with all sports, except football. The Big East consists of the "Catholic 7" plus Butler, Xavier, and Creighton.
The
football teams that left the Big Beast, Cincinnati, Connecticut, South
Florida, and Temple find themselves in a new, rebuilt conference, named
the American Athletic Conference.
People immediately laugh at
the ridiculous of the name. But why is it so ridiculous? If nothing else, it's patriotic. It emphasizes "athletics." They don't want to be
called the AAC (a division III conference actually has that nickname),
they simply want to be called "The American." I don't see what's so
funny about that.
When you look at the name and the
teams, you immediately want to dismiss this conferences. A few leftovers
from the Big East and the best of Conference USA. Some want to say the
American is C-USA 2.0.
But Cincy and Uconn are both
above C-USA level. In both football and basketball. Both schools have a
combined 3 BCS bowl appearances and a combined 5 National Championships
in basketball, including Uconn's most recent run in 2011.
The American hit a lot of major markets - Hartford, Tampa, Orlando, Memphis, Dallas, in the future New Orleans.
When
people think about Cincinnati and Uconn being "losers" in the
realignment game, that's not really fair. It depends on your
interpretation of what makes a school a winner or a loser.
From a basketball perspective, Cincinnati is a winner. The
Bearcats went 9-9 in Big East conference play last season. Of the 15
teams they played in those 18 games, they play only two of them this
season, Louisville and Uconn. With teams like Georgetown, Marquette,
Syracuse off the schedule, Cincy has a chance to improve further on
their record. And after three straight tournament appearances, Cincy is
on track for a fourth.
Teams like Cincy, Uconn,
Memphis won't be hurt from playing the American. Teams will be forced to
bolster their non-conference schedules and the conference play will be
even more competitive because it is much more wide open. Teams like SMU,
Houston, UCF have a chance to make a major name for themselves moving
forward.
The American has a TV contract with ESPN, something
C-USA did not, so SMU, coached by Larry Brown, has a chance to play a
possibly ranked Uconn team on ESPN. When was the last time SMU
basketball was on TV? Or Central Florida? The teams at the bottom of the
conference receive a major boost, in exposure and financially.
Now
football is a different story. Cincinnati, along with Uconn, and USF,
the three remaining Big East teams, all will have a hard time getting
respect. While Big East basketball was so well respected, and with
tournament bids the ultimate sign of a strong program, football is a
much different story.
The Big East hardly got
recognized to begin with. Now under a different name, with teams that
are far less accomplished than the departing teams like Pittsburgh and
Syracuse, earning respect will be even harder to come by.
Cincinnati went 9-3 last season and played in the Belk Bowl
against 6-6 Duke. Michigan went 8-4 and played South Carolina in the
Outback Bowl on New Year's Day. The difference between the Big East and
the Big Ten.
Playing in bowls like Belk, Beef O' Brady's,
and BBVA Compass make national exposure and respect a challenge.
Especially when the opponents are bottom of the standings BCS schools or
Conference USA schools.
Beginning in 2014, the five major
conferences (ACC, Big 12, B1G, Pac 12, SEC) will automatically earn a
spot in the "Access Bowls" which is the same as the former BCS bowls,
beginning in 2014. When the playoffs begin, those five conferences will
undoubtedly receive the most attention. If Alabama and Oregon are 12-0
and Ohio State and Oklahoma are 11-1, and Cincinnati or Boise State are
12-0, there is a strong possibility one of the "lower tier schools" like
Cincy and Boise will be left out in favor of a one-loss Big 12 or Big
Ten school.
The American Conference as a
whole is a realignment winner because there are no expectations. When
Missouri and Texas A&M moved to the SEC, expectations immediately
skyrocketed, especially in football. Nebraska is under more pressure now
in the Big Ten than they were in the Big 12.
Look at
West Virginia. If they didn't win "that joke of a football conference"
every year and go to a BCS game, the season was a failure. Cincy and
Uconn do not have "BCS-or-bust" expectations, despite both recently
playing in bowl games. There isn't pressure he like there is at other
schools, in other conferences.
There's no
pressure for Cincinnati because if they go 8-4 or 7-5 in football, so
what. National media will say they are in a lower tiered conference
anyways. But the conference is satisfied to have a team with winning
record and players and fans will enjoy a bowl game experience. But if
they are constantly at the 10-11 win mark, respect will come nationally.
Same
thing with basketball. Expectation was that the old Big East had 10
NCAA tourney teams every year. The American has a chance to create their
own legacy. Their own champions and impact the field of 65 every year.
The
expectation is that we assume The American doesn't exist, so when teams
make it onto the national radar or spotlight, eyes will open and people
will listen. The conference will either do what the national media
expects, or there will be six major conferences again in the future, not
five like people say now.


Cincinnati is one of a handful of teams that have won 10 games 5 of the last 6 years, gone to 2 BCS bowl games, and won 3 other bowl games (against SEC and ACC teams). It's a shame they don't get more respect for the good on-field performance and much better than average academic record.
ReplyDeleteCincinnati has grown accustomed to winning. Sorry but 8-4 or 7-3 in this conference will never be acceptable. This isn't a knock on the new conference, it has lots of potential, but its not as talented as the Old BE. They were winning 10 games a year against stiffer competition in conference, and some decent wins OOC (Oregon state, Illinois, Va Tech, A decent Fresno St and Hawaii, plus 3 bowl wins) all in the last 5 years. The only other BCS schools to win 10+ games 5 of the last 6 years is Alabama and Oregon. The Bearcats are in Good company there. The bearcats are averaging 8.6 wins per season since joining a BCS conference.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete